Making and Remaking Horror in the 1970s and 2000s
Why Don't They Do It Like They Used To? (livre en anglais)
de David Roche
Moyenne des votes :
0 | vote | ![]() |
0 | vote | ![]() |
0 | vote | ![]() |
0 | vote | ![]() |
Votre vote : -
Description de l'ouvrage :
In Making and Remaking Horror in the 1970s and 2000s author David Roche takes up the assumption shared by many fans and scholars that original horror movies are more “disturbing,” and thus better than the remakes. He assesses the qualities of movies, old and recast, according to criteria that include subtext, originality, and cohesion. With a methodology that combines a formalist and cultural studies approach, Roche sifts aspects of the American horror movie that have been widely addressed (class, the patriarchal family, gender, and the opposition between terror and horror) and those that have been somewhat neglected (race, the Gothic, style, and verisimilitude). Containing seventy-eight black-and-white illustrations, the book is grounded in a close comparative analysis of the politics and aesthetics of four of the most significant independent American horror movies of the 1970s—The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, The Hills Have Eyes, Dawn of the Dead, and Halloween—and their twenty-first-century remakes.
To what extent can the politics of these films be described as “disturbing” insomuch as they promote subversive subtexts that undermine essentialist perspectives? Do the politics of the film lie on the surface or are they wedded to the film's aesthetics? Early in the book, Roche explores historical contexts, aspects of identity (race, ethnicity, and class), and the structuring role played by the motif of the American nuclear family. He then asks to what extent these films disrupt genre expectations and attempt to provoke emotions of dread, terror, and horror through their representations of the monstrous and the formal strategies employed? In this inquiry, he examines definitions of the genre and its metafictional nature. Roche ends with a meditation on the extent to which the technical limitations of the horror films of the 1970s actually contribute to this “disturbing” quality. Moving far beyond the genre itself, Making and Remaking Horror studies the redux as a form of adaptation and enables a more complete discussion of the evolution of horror in contemporary American cinema.
Revue de Presse :
"David Roche clearly knows the cycle of recent horror remakes better than anyone else. In Making and Remaking Horror in the 1970s and 2000s, he provides an exhaustive account of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, The Hills Have Eyes, Dawn of the Dead, and Halloween and the originals upon which they are based. Roche's work is likely to find its place among the numerous books on the horror genre as the authoritative text on horror remakes. "
- Barry Keith Grant, Brock University, Canada, author of 100 Science Fiction Films and Invasion of the Body Snatchers and editor of The Dread of Difference: Gender and the Horror Film
Voir le site internet de l'éditeur University Press of Mississippi
> Du même auteur :
Transnationalism and Imperialism (2022)
Endurance of the Global Western Film
Dir. Hervé Mayer et David Roche
Sujet : Sociologie
Comics and Adaptation (2020)
Dir. Benoît Mitaine, David Roche et Isabelle Schmitt-Pitiot
Sujet : Technique > Adaptation
Quentin Tarantino (2018)
Poetics and Politics of Cinematic Metafiction
de David Roche
Sujet : Réalisateur > Quentin Tarantino
Intimacy in Cinema (2014)
Critical Essays on English Language Films
Dir. David Roche et Isabelle Schmitt-Pitiot
Sujet : Sociologie
> Sur un thème proche :
Remaking Horror (2013)
Hollywood's New Reliance on Scares of Old
Back from the Dead (2011)
Remakes of the Romero Zombie Films as Markers of Their Times
Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror Film Sequels, Series and Remakes (2018)
An Illustrated Filmography, Volume II (1996–2016)
de Kim R. Holston et Tom Winchester
Sujet : Genre > Fantastique
Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror Film Sequels, Series and Remakes (2016)
An Illustrated Filmography, With Plot Synopses and Critical Commentary
de Kim R. Holston et Tom Winchester
Sujet : Genre > Fantastique