Les livres en français sont sur www.livres-cinema.info
What Film Is Good For
On the Values of Spectatorship
de Julian Hanich et Martin P. Rossouw
(0 vote)Moyenne des votes :
| 0 | vote |  = On peut s'en passer |
| 0 | vote |  = Bon livre |
| 0 | vote |  = Excellent livre |
| 0 | vote |  = Unique / une référence |
Votre vote : -
Description de l'ouvrage:
For well over a century, going to the movies has been a favorite pastime for billions across the globe. But is film actually good for anything? This volume brings together thirty-six scholars, critics, and filmmakers in search of an answer. Their responses range from the most personal to the most theoretical—and, together, recast current debates about film ethics. Movie watching here emerges as a wellspring of value, able to sustain countless visions of "the good life." Films, these authors affirm, make us reflect, connect, adapt; they evoke wonder and beauty; they challenge and transform. In a word, its varieties of value make film invaluable.
À propos des auteurs :
Julian Hanich is Associate Professor of Film Studies at the University of Groningen. He is author of The Audience Effect: On the Collective Cinema Experience and Cinematic Emotion in Horror Films and Thrillers: The Aesthetic Paradox of Pleasurable Fear.
Martin P. Rossouw is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Art History and Image Studies at the University of the Free State, South Africa. He is author of Transformational Ethics of Film: Thinking the Cinemakeover in the Film-Philosophy Debate.
Revue de Presse:
"Readers will find What Film is Good For an expansive toolkit to make use of going forward."— Cineaste"One of the most commendable aspects of What Film is Good For is its accessibility. While grounded in scholarly inquiry, the anthology remains engaging and approachable for general readers, academics, and cinephiles alike. . . . It is written by and for people who take cinema seriously, and it is rousing to read such varied and thought-provoking chapters on the value of film, all of which ultimately affirm the meaningfulness of this beloved medium. . . . a true treasure for an academic anthology to prove so stirring." — Alphaville
"What Film Is Good For is a wonderfully ambitious and timely collection that takes the form, in a sense, of a questionnaire—one that importantly does not seek or need a singular response to the question it asks, as if film could only be good in one way or for one thing, or simply not at all. The diversity of responses collected here is itself a profound lesson in how capacious a moral claim need be if moral it truly is."—Brian Price, author of A Theory of Regret
"Whether one agrees with the writers' propositions, the pleasure of thinking through the claims, pondering these questions of worth, value, profit, loss, the many 'good fors' as well as the occasional 'not good for,' is a good, indeed, an excellence in itself, opening to a vast and valuable conversation."—Janet Staiger, author of Interpreting Films: Studies in the Historical Reception of American Cinema and Perverse Spectators: The Practices of Film Reception
"Their volume bookended by two marvelous pieces by filmmakers (Mike Figgis and Radu Jude), Julian Hanich and Martin Rossouw have assembled a peerless group of contributors to explore a wide range of compelling questions about film ethics and the value(s) of spectatorship. The result is a foundational volume for Screen Studies."—Catherine Grant, founding author of Film Studies for Free
Voir le site internet de l'éditeur University of California Press
> Des mêmes auteurs :
The Structures of the Film Experience by Jean-Pierre Meunier (2019)
Historical Assessments and Phenomenological Expansions
Dir. Julian Hanich et Daniel Fairfax
Sujet : Film Analysis
> Sur un thème proche :
How Popular Culture Destroys Our Political Imagination (2024)
Capitalism and Its Alternatives in Film and Television
Sujet : Sociology
Watching Films (2013)
New Perspectives on Movie-Going, Exhibition and Reception
Dir. Albert Moran et Karina Aveyard
Sujet : Sociology
Retour
